Skip to content
Massive IT

Compliance and governance

Risk Assessments

Identify, evaluate, and prioritize technology and security risks.

Tampa headquarters · Customers nationwide

From scope to evidence

Risk Assessments

Identify, evaluate, and prioritize technology and security risks.

Readiness is a maintained state.

Compliance holds up when evidence is collected continuously, not assembled the week before an audit.

  1. 01Scope

    We agree which framework applies and what is genuinely in scope.

  2. 02Assess

    Current controls are tested against each requirement.

  3. 03Remediate

    Gaps are closed with owners, dates, and evidence attached.

  4. 04Evidence

    Documentation and monitoring artifacts are collected continuously.

  5. 05Maintain

    Reviews keep the position defensible between audits.

What the program includes

The work that makes an audit boring.

Scope, policy, control, and evidence work that keeps a readiness position current between reviews.

Service overview PDFPDF
01

Asset and threat identification

02

Likelihood and impact scoring

03

Treatment options and recommendations

04

Risk register maintenance

05

Vendor and third-party risk review

Where audits go sideways

Gaps surface fastest under questioning.

  • Risks discussed informally and never recorded
  • No consistent way to compare one risk with another
  • Owner and treatment unassigned
  • Third-party access never reviewed

What a ready organization looks like

  • A written, ranked risk register
  • Consistent scoring across the business
  • Named owners and treatment decisions
  • Third-party access reviewed on a schedule

Frequently asked questions

Let's talk about where you stand.

Schedule a Consultation

Planning priorities

Prioritize risk using business context

Prioritize risk using business context: review areas, evidence and business purpose
ExposureEvidence to reviewAssets, threats and existing safeguardsWhy it mattersUnderstand what could affect critical operations.
ImpactEvidence to reviewConsequences and documented likelihood rationaleWhy it mattersCompare risks using a consistent method.
TreatmentEvidence to reviewMitigation owners and accepted residual riskWhy it mattersTurn findings into accountable decisions.

The governance tool reviews risk-management practices; it does not calculate your organization's complete risk profile.

Free self-assessment

Security Governance Self-Assessment

Are security decisions owned, documented, and reviewed—or left to assumptions?

Start the assessment